---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: Legally India website owner Kian Ganz fabricates evidence to cover up Harish Salve criminality exposed in Panama Papers
To: "KIAN GANZ (Legally India)" <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com>, cp.alokkumarverma@delhipolice.gov.in, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov, sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>
Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>
MF records include a recommendation letter from Salve to Rawi & Co in 2007, asking them to set up a company and a trust for Ramesh Mahajan and Asha Mahajan. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/
Was Harish Salve bribing an Indian Judge by setting up off-shore company & trust for these Canada based Mahajans? Who are these Mahajans? What is their connection to Salve?
"MF records show that Salve is listed as a director in Crestbright Ltd, which was registered in 2012 with Salendra Swarup as another director." Who is this Salendra Swarup? Is it the lawyer Shailendra Swarup?
Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
When I posted comments stating the correct facts, Kian Ganz deleted them. See below.
Seema Sapra"No, I am not the investigating agency, neither Kian are you. So you cannot give Salve the clean chit to use Indian lingo.I again say an investigation is needed.Kian in your enthusiasm to defend Salve you have misrepresented facts and have clearly not been an objective journalist.Indian Express is not the investigating agency and they obviously have only limited facts which they have disclosed which primafacie raise the issue of questionable activity by Harish Salve."and" MF records include a recommendation letter from Salve to Rawi & Co in 2007, asking them to set up a company and a trust for Ramesh Mahajan and Asha Mahajan. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news- india/panama-papers-india- part-1-list-garware-shishir-k- bajoria-harish-salve/#sthash. vfEw9vDQ.dpuf This is not a lawyer referring a client to a law-firm.We have no idea who these Mahajans are. They could be terrorists, or fixers, or money launderers. An investigation will reveal the facts.Kian, your defence of Salve is so lame. Why do you defend him like this I wonder?This is not a privacy issue. So now you ask why name the friend?We do not know what Salve disclosed or not in his tax papers.Again an investigation is required."
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Kian Ganz is fabricating evidence to cover up Harish Salve criminality exposed in Panama Papers.
MF records include a recommendation letter from Salve to Rawi & Co in 2007, asking them to set up a company and a trust for Ramesh Mahajan and Asha Mahajan. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news- india/panama-papers-india- part-1-list-garware-shishir-k- bajoria-harish-salve/#sthash. rum1U5KG.dpuf The above fact is misrepresented by Kian Ganz at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/ harish-salve-panama-papers- coverage-unfair-privacy- invasion-disclosed-all- investments-paid-rs-175-cr-of- tax by suggesting "referring clients to other law firms does not seem illegal and something lawyers do all the time." Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Kian Ganz,Did you post this anonymously? "Please delete the nonsensical comments by Sapra so that we can have a proper discusion." at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/ harish-salve-panama-papers- coverage-unfair-privacy- invasion-disclosed-all- investments-paid-rs-175-cr-of- tax#comments Sure looks like your handiwork.Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
To Kian Ganz,
If anything is henceforth published on Legally India impersonating me or if I am targeted by or on Legally India in any manner (as has happened in the past on several occasions) I will report it to the authorities and take all legal action available to me.
Seema SapraGeneral Electric Company whistleblower
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:08 PM, KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> wrote:
Like I've said, it should be disabled now.
--
Kian Ganz
Publishing Editor
Legally India - News for Lawyers
http://www.LegallyIndia.com
kian.ganz@LegallyIndia.com
Tel (India): +91 900 405 6651
Twitter: http://twitter.com/legallyindia On 5/4/16 18:05, Seema Sapra wrote:Kian Ganz,
After you post the comment below, I want the account to be dismantled now. I will never again want to publish anything on your propaganda outfit Legally India.Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Please post the following last ever comment on Legally India under my name on the thread http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench- litigation/harish-salve- panama-papers-coverage-unfair- privacy-invasion-disclosed- all-investments-paid-rs-175- cr-of-tax#comments
"Seema Sapra has requested that her Legally India account be dismantled and we have done that."Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:56 PM, KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> wrote:
Your commenting and blogging account has been disabled Seema, as requested.
I have left the username 'Seema Sapra' blocked though so no one can post comments in your name, as had happened before. If you ever want to leave a comment on something that concerns you in your own name, please let me know and I'll re-enable the account.
All the best,
Kian
On 5/4/16 17:54, Seema Sapra wrote:Kian Ganz,
Please confirm to me that my account has been disabled as I requested. You use your website as a propaganda tool as you also did in the article on me. You lie on your website and in your emails. You censor the truth.Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Kian Ganz,
Well, Please disable my account. I have no wish to be part of your propaganda website.
I will expose you for sure.Seema Sapra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
No I will disable it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:48 PM, KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com>wrote:
See my previous email - I can disable your account for you if you like, your call.
--
Kian Ganz
Publishing Editor
Legally India - News for Lawyers
http://www.LegallyIndia.com
kian.ganz@LegallyIndia.com
Tel (India): +91 900 405 6651
Twitter: http://twitter.com/legallyindia On 5/4/16 17:46, Seema Sapra wrote:You again deleted the reposted comment. If you do not post this and my subsequent comment, I will disable my account with LI. I don't like being used for your propaganda.
Seema Sapra
"MF records include a recommendation letter from Salve to Rawi & Co in 2007, asking them to set up a company and a trust for Ramesh Mahajan and Asha Mahajan. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news- india/panama-papers-india- part-1-list-garware-shishir-k- bajoria-harish-salve/#sthash. vfEw9vDQ.dpuf
This is not a lawyer referring a client to a law-firm.Kian, your defence of Salve is so lame. Why do you defend him like this I wonder?This is not a privacy issue. So now you ask why name the friend?We do not know what Salve disclosed or not in his tax papers.Again an investigation is required" .
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Why Kian, you moderated one comment, I re-posted it having removed the part you objected to. Why do you want to disable my commenting privileges on LI?I think its better to have a public exchange here than you sending me emails on the side.Why are you now moderating my comments?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:22 PM, KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> wrote:
You are posting borderline defamatory stuff which has no basis in fact other than hypotheticals, and I don't have time at all today to go back and forth with you for a dozen comments. Will moderate future unreasonable comments on this along same line.
No comments:
Post a Comment