How Clifford Chance funded Kian Ganz disabled links that expose corruption & fraud by General Electric Company on Legally India

After the contempt judgment was issued against me on 17 December 2014, Clifford Chance and AZB & Partners funded Kian Ganz published an article on the Legally India website intending to depict me as mentally ill. I responded in my comments and managed to foil this planned disinformation campaign. In my comments, I linked to the court documents in my corruption case against General Electric Company. Many people visited my blog pages by using these links. On 21/22 December 2015, Kian Ganz suddenly disabled the links in my comments to prevent readers from accessing the public court documents that I had linked to. Obviously this was done to protect General Electric. When I complained to Kian Ganz, he lied, covered up, and finally became aggressive and threatening and point blank refused to re-enable the links. The emails that were exchanged on this topic are reproduced below. I knew this was a deliberate act of Kian Ganz but at one point I humored him by suggesting that he should fix the software glitch that he claimed by replying that maybe GE had hacked his servers. Note how he uses this against me.

For the public exchange online on Legally India see http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2015/12/revealing-exchange-with-seema-sapra.html  or http://propagandaoutfitlegallyindia.blogspot.in/2016/04/revealing-exchange-with-seema-sapra_7.html

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM Subject: links in my comments at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt#comment-79437 To: Kian Ganz <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Hey Kian, The links in my comments at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt#comment-79437 are not active. Have they been disabled? They were active links till yesterday. Seema Sapra

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:42 PM Subject: Re: links in my comments at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt#comment-79437 To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Links look fine from here... Not sure why they're not appearing on your comp. Maybe refresh the page? -- Kian Ganz Publishing Editor Legally India - News for Lawyers

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:46 PM Subject: Re: links in my comments at http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt#comment-79437 To: "KIAN GANZ (Legally India)" <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> I refreshed and checked. Still not working. The web addresses for the links are there but are no longer highlighted and clicking on them does not work.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:54 PM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Maybe it's because the thread has been locked for further commenting so links aren't showing on non-admin accounts like mine. Not sure, have never been aware of this. Will get our coders to investigate some time, but it's really not a priority to fix such a minor software bug Seema, people can follow the links manually if required. -- Kian Ganz Publishing Editor Legally India - News for Lawyers

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: "KIAN GANZ (Legally India)" <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Maybe GE had your website hacked and the links in my comments disabled. They obviously don't want people to read the docs & blogs I have linked to.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:50 PM Subject: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Some software fluke or so, not sure why. Worst case if it doesn't on some computers, people can always copy-paste the link in their browser manually -- -- Kian Ganz

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:28 PM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: "KIAN GANZ (Legally India)" <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Kian, The links in my comments are not working at all. I checked in 3 computers. They were definitely working yesterday. Since this is such an important thread, could you please try to rectify this? BTW are you on German time? Thanks, Seema

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Seema, Now that is exactly what I was referring to earlier as a textbook example of paranoia because your suspicion that GE hacked Legally India does not make any logical sense whatsoever. There is not a single snowflake in hell chance that they hacked our server. And even if they did, for argument's sake, why would they do something as silly as removing hyperlinks, when people can see and follow the links anyway with 3 extra clicks? Why did they leave the hyperlinks intact in the copy of the story? Why wouldn't they just hack your blog directly instead, if they're such sophisticated computer hackers? Why would they not lean heavily on Google to remove your blogs from Google's indexes? There are literally hundreds of reasons for why what you are saying could not make any reasonable sense whatsoever and is beyond the realm of what a reasonable person (or judge for that matter) would believe. These kinds of suspicions hurt your credibility and case. I assume that because I'm trying to convince you that your suspicion is untrue, you'll next assume that GE bribed or otherwise influenced me to remove the links? Again, if they had, for argument's sake, we would not even have allowed your comments in the first place, presumably, or would have deleted all links to your blog from the article copy. The world is a messed up place Seema, I agree, but not everything that goes wrong in your life can be remotely linked back to GE. Web content software is very complicated and I can sadly point out 50 bugs on our website to do with complex systems such as user account registration, commenting, etc that unfortunately don't work the way they are intended to. Usually a computer bug is just a bug rather than a conspiracy. In my humble opinion, you'd serve your own cause better if you focused on what's important in your case and proving the initial instance of corruption, etc, rather than wasting your time chasing spectres... Anyway, I know what I say will have limited effect and you'll not believe any of what I say, so I'm not sure why I'm engaging on this. Take care, Kian

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: "KIAN GANZ (Legally India)" <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Hey Kian, I think you are making too much of my comment. Lets just leave it here. Seema

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Not sure, it works here (see attached) To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Seema, I'm not sure whether I am making too much of it. To me (and others who were in my shoes) your suspicion expressed in the email (that "Maybe GE had your website hacked and the links in my comments disabled. They obviously don't want people to read the docs & blogs I have linked to.") seems indicative of your mindset that seeks conspiracy against GE where there often is none. This casts into doubt your other claims made against GE, particularly things such as dogs barking or the repeated poisoning allegations where there has never been any evidence other than your self-diagnosed feeling of being poisoned. Suffice it to say, you must realise that you don't always come across as a completely objective or an impartial observer in such matters, which is why lawyers, judges, friends, etc disbelieve you and don't take your more serious allegations seriously (because they're mixed in with the subjective and paranoid-seeming). Anyway, like I said, I'm not sure why I'm still engaging on this, but I wish you all the best, Kian -- Kian Ganz

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 11:45 PM Subject: Re: Seema Sapra (@SeemaSapraLaw) mentioned you in conversation on Twitter! To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Hi Seema - don't you have more important things to do than badger me about the comments, such as preparing for your SC appeal? Like I said, trying to find out what's causing the bug is not a priority for our developers right now, who have more serious bugs to stamp out first. Your protest is noted though and we'll try to get it fixed when we are able to. Thanks Kian -- Kian Ganz

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 1:50 PM Subject: link in your story http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt To: Kian Ganz <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com>, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com> Kian, Even the following link in your story is not working. Update 18 December 12:54: Sapra has published a response to the high court decision on her blog that she would appeal to the Supreme Court and that the ruling and her imprisonment would “enable my being drugged and poisoned in a prison and my being eventually eliminated”: http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2015/12/fwd-general-electric-fcpa-obstruction_18.html This link was working until at least the day before. You need to at least fix this link where you linked to my response on my blog. The link is http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2015/12/fwd-general-electric-fcpa-obstruction_18.html Journalistic integrity demands that you fix this link which you inserted so as to incorporate my response to your story. Seema Sapra

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIAN GANZ (Legally India) <kian.ganz@legallyindia.com> Date: Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 6:28 PM Subject: Re: link in your story http://www.legallyindia.com/bar-bench-litigation/heavy-handed-lawyer-seema-sapra-sentenced-to-1-month-jail-for-calling-judge-and-many-others-corrupt To: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> I think the link in the story must have been inserted incorrectly from the get-go, have fixed it. The editor's picks tag had also disappeared, have fixed. That said, please stop spamming on Twitter and in comments to stories that have nothing to do with your case. I'll unpublish your comment to the CJI Thakur story - you having an LI account does not mean you can use it like your blog and Twitter on random stories... If there's any issue, send me an email, I usually read them and take action if it's possible to do anything. -- Kian Ganz